Swiss banking secrecy – quo vadis?

For the past nine months the Swiss banking secrecy has been under enormous pressure from the United States, Germany, France and the UK. Some of these countries are demanding an automatic information exchange. Others have demanded the abolition of the different treatment of tax evasion and tax fraud by Switzerland. If Switzerland is not cooperative on this, the OECD will put the country on a black list of tax havens. This would have grave consequences for the Swiss banking industry and for the country’s economy as a whole. The Swiss government caved in to the pressure and decided to give up making a difference between tax evasion and tax fraud for foreigners after Singapore, Liechtenstein, Austria and Luxemburg all had announced, they would adhere to OECD standards from now on.

Nothing has happened as yet. Switzerland has double taxation treaties with 70 countries in which the treatment of income, capital gains and inheritance tax is governed. South Africa is one of the member countries with a double taxation agreement in place. The treaties also describe the treatment of tax evasion and tax fraud. In the future, Switzerland will cooperate in documented cases of tax evasion. If above mentioned countries accept this new offer, it will be part of individual negotiations. Switzerland will probably demand that tax havens such as British Virgin Islands or Cayman be treated the same. Instead of offering automatic information exchange, Switzerland will likely offer an automatic but anonymous withholding tax on interest (and possibly dividends) to other countries such as the US, much like the EU withholding tax.

What does this mean for investors with assets in Switzerland?

For investors with declared assets nothing will change. Those with non-declared assets will be at a higher risk than in the past, no matter where the assets are placed. Income out of those assets will likely be levied with a non-refundable withholding tax of up to 35%. International money transfers will become very risky. Such transactions can easily be backtracked to the paying bank. Incoming money transfers from abroad will likely be tracked and the receiver checked for full tax compliance.

We recommend entering into tax compliant solutions to avoid withholding taxes, to guard your privacy and to arrange your estate. SARS has recently given the green light for an off-shore life wrapper by means of an Advanced Tax Ruling. They confirmed that whilst the assets are within the structure, no income tax or capital gains tax will apply. When funds are withdrawn or the structure is abolished, CGT will apply on the net gain. Current market conditions make such a structure certainly favourable, as many equity based portfolios carry an unrealised loss. In contrast to other (unapproved) life wrappers, it is possible to incorporate existing assets, such as share and bond investments. They do not have to be redeemed or switched into other investment vehicles, thereby incurring unnecessary costs. Further, the investor can retain his custodian bank, provided it forms part of one of the approved banks within the network, and he/she can retain his investment advisor as well as his/her investment strategy.

Estate planning is taken care of within the structure, by nominating beneficiaries. There is no need for a foreign will or an off-shore executor to distribute the assets, savings costs and time. Multiple owners and life assureds are also possible.

The structure is fully tax compliant an approved by SARS. After transfer of the assets into the structure, you no longer have declarable and taxable income or capital gains. This solution is not only ideal for South African investors, but is also recommended for citizens of Germany, Spain, Italy, UK, Scandinavia and all US persons (other countries on request).

For more information, please contact Tony R. Hug on 082-4533189.

Related posts

Market and economic outlook for June


How to not be a ‘financial nihilist’


Making sense of potentially confusing investment concepts


Infrastructure investing in SA vs. the rest of the continent